can it be safe to assume.............

For all Carb and Injection engines, standard or modified plus non-standard engine transplants. Heads; Blocks; Cooling (including heater issues related to the cooling system); Mounts etc
Forum rules
Hints, tips and guides for repair and modification - the FAQ section on the main website is worth checking first for information relating to common faults and technical help. Useful posts and guides will be added to the FAQ http://www.sciroccoregister.co.uk/scirocco-faq
Post Reply
GTXTRA
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: London

can it be safe to assume.............

Post by GTXTRA »

that when driving the brm a build up of steam on the two extra vdo instruments in place of the ashtray and stereo display is related to a less than healthy heater exchanger - damp underlay too...........
:thankyou:


Serial Rocco-ist.........
Nate
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cirencester / Swindon

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Nate »

it's be a reasonable guess. there's a chance it could be the hoses going to it - i can't remember if the rubber hoses go inside the cabin or it the tails from the heater matrix poke into the engine bay.

is it using coolant? if yes, it's almost certainly a glitch in the matrix :hugegrin:


i'll get my coat


Image

Check out my photostream on Flickr
'69 bay, '79 bay, '74 bug, '78 GLS, '91 GT2, '10 SAAB 9-3
User avatar
Funky Diver
Posts: 1175
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:26 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Darlington
Contact:

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Funky Diver »

I'm with Nate, unles of course you have an aftermarket kettle fitted?


Nate
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cirencester / Swindon

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Nate »

Funky Diver wrote:I'm with Nate
you said you weren't gonna tell anyone :shocking:



can i be pedantic and ask why a coolant leak question is posted in electrical? :scratch: :hugegrin: ;)


Image

Check out my photostream on Flickr
'69 bay, '79 bay, '74 bug, '78 GLS, '91 GT2, '10 SAAB 9-3
Nate
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cirencester / Swindon

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Nate »

ok, i'll be slightly more helpful. if you get yourself a hose joiner like this (check size before buying, think you'd want a 12mm one, but don't quote me on that )and disconnect the 2 water pipes in the engine bay and then join the ends together (make sense?) then at least you will stop the water leak until you can get a proper repair done and keep the car driveable, if somewhat cold on the inside

i wouldn't recommend the use of Radweld*, but i'm sure you wouldn't do that to one of your motors anyway




*other brands of cooling system abuse are available


Image

Check out my photostream on Flickr
'69 bay, '79 bay, '74 bug, '78 GLS, '91 GT2, '10 SAAB 9-3
GTXTRA
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: London

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by GTXTRA »

Nate wrote:
Funky Diver wrote:I'm with Nate
you said you weren't gonna tell anyone :shocking:



can i be pedantic and ask why a coolant leak question is posted in electrical? :scratch: :hugegrin: ;)
even i was flumuxxed re where this would get quickest response sire - a point worth making through !

''Electrical
For all electrical questions; Alternators; Lights; Instruments; Gauges; MFA; Heater blower (not coolant related) issues etc etc''.


Serial Rocco-ist.........
GTXTRA
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: London

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by GTXTRA »

Nate wrote:ok, i'll be slightly more helpful. if you get yourself a hose joiner like this (check size before buying, think you'd want a 12mm one, but don't quote me on that )and disconnect the 2 water pipes in the engine bay and then join the ends together (make sense?) then at least you will stop the water leak until you can get a proper repair done and keep the car driveable, if somewhat cold on the inside

i wouldn't recommend the use of Radweld*, but i'm sure you wouldn't do that to one of your motors anyway




*other brands of cooling system abuse are available

thanks - think i'll have a crack at changing the exchanger anyway, bought a stash of four a couple of years back.


Serial Rocco-ist.........
MikeH
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:39 am
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Nr Banbury, UK

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by MikeH »

Given it was pouring with rain all last week, are you sure you want to pull out the matrix, when it could be another cause?

It's only the matrix if you're losing coolant too.


1992 Scala ABF - SOLD
1989 Scala track toy. Dormant
1986 GTX - Lunar mileage but still a good un
Mk1 Classic Touring Car Project...slowly does it
1984 1.6 GT Project. 69k In progress
1.6GL. 2 Owners, 60k. SOLD
1.6 GL - 100k miles -Back on the road!
GTXTRA
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: London

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by GTXTRA »

MikeH wrote:Given it was pouring with rain all last week, are you sure you want to pull out the matrix, when it could be another cause?

It's only the matrix if you're losing coolant too.
hear what you say Mike - the steam issue has been there for a while tbh but i will review at weekend depending if the damn rain keeps away until then.


Serial Rocco-ist.........
Nate
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cirencester / Swindon

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Nate »

GTXTRA wrote: even i was flumuxxed re where this would get quickest response sire - a point worth making through !

''Electrical
For all electrical questions; Alternators; Lights; Instruments; Gauges; MFA; Heater blower (not coolant related) issues etc etc''.
how much more pedantic can i get? :nerner:

i would think that it is more likely to be coolant, as a slight weep (as opposed to full on leak) would tend to come out as steam - easier to get inside things. i'd also guess that your cars don't actually see rain that often.

probably worth taking out the offending electrickery and putting it in the airing cupboard for a few days


Image

Check out my photostream on Flickr
'69 bay, '79 bay, '74 bug, '78 GLS, '91 GT2, '10 SAAB 9-3
GTXTRA
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: London

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by GTXTRA »

HA! moving :ok:

just because i dont like driving around in a shed doesn't mean they dont get wet - :groove:


Serial Rocco-ist.........
MrD
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:55 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by MrD »

Have exactly the same prob in mine,just thought it was cos i am not using it much,also get condensation in the dash,think my sunroof seal is gone though,as i get water dripping off the top bar of the cage.
Not 100% sure my cage is for a sunroof roc either,as i am sure i can see a sort of ripple at the front of the roof.Heater motor packed up a few months ago,so may be getting wet too :ire:


6 point cage,Koni`s,lower front brace,rear brace,goodridge hoses,4,2,1,supersprint back box,k+n,kent gs2h,vernier,skimmed and ported head,alloy fuel tank.catch tank,Short shift ,9A soon.
Image
Nate
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
fill in the right answer: 10
Location: Cirencester / Swindon

Re: can it be safe to assume.............

Post by Nate »

GTXTRA wrote:just because i dont like driving around in a shed...
non taken :hehe: slightly concerned that i'm actually starting to like my french shed. time to put it on ebay and buy a caddy methinks


Image

Check out my photostream on Flickr
'69 bay, '79 bay, '74 bug, '78 GLS, '91 GT2, '10 SAAB 9-3
Post Reply