Engine change to vr6
Forum rules
Hints, tips and guides for repair and modification - the FAQ section on the main website is worth checking first for information relating to common faults and technical help. Useful posts and guides will be added to the FAQ http://www.sciroccoregister.co.uk/scirocco-faq
Hints, tips and guides for repair and modification - the FAQ section on the main website is worth checking first for information relating to common faults and technical help. Useful posts and guides will be added to the FAQ http://www.sciroccoregister.co.uk/scirocco-faq
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:21 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
Engine change to vr6
Hi all Scirocco Brothers and Sisters I have just bought crashbangs lovely red k reg And would like to ask your views on changing it to a VR6 all of your feelings and advice are needed before I make a decision on this
Many thanks
Dirty Sturty
Many thanks
Dirty Sturty
- bengould
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:25 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: Renfrew.
Re: Engine change to vr6
Can be done. Has been done before and will probably be done again.
The main view is that the engine is too heavy for such a light car and for the power you get you are better off with a 20v turbo. Slightly less work to get it in and much more tuneable.
That being said, if that's what you want to do, don't let me put you off.
Ben.
The main view is that the engine is too heavy for such a light car and for the power you get you are better off with a 20v turbo. Slightly less work to get it in and much more tuneable.
That being said, if that's what you want to do, don't let me put you off.
Ben.
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:35 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: Central London and Essex
Re: Engine change to vr6
What Ben said, especially the subject of weight!
1984 MK2 Havanna brown Storm
1989 MK2 Alpine white Scala injection
2006 Audi A4 3.0TDI quattro (the beast)
1989 MK2 Alpine white Scala injection
2006 Audi A4 3.0TDI quattro (the beast)
-
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:34 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: BEDFORD
- Contact:
Re: Engine change to vr6
Yes, unless you just want to drive fast in straight lines, a lighter engine will be much more suitable.
Register Member 829
--
1980 (1976) Mk1 Junior Cup Replica
1987 MK2 GTX
--
1980 (1976) Mk1 Junior Cup Replica
1987 MK2 GTX
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:13 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: Surrey
Re: Engine change to vr6
Off the shelf kits available if you have the money. Note point 7 here -
http://eurowise.com/shop/index.php?main ... ucts_id=11
http://eurowise.com/shop/index.php?main ... ucts_id=11
- unknownmale
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:34 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: London
Re: Engine change to vr6
I've always liked the idea of this conversion, but the ABF is probably still the best route in my opinion.
- David
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:29 am
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: cheshire
Re: Engine change to vr6
2good guides to doing the 1.8 20v conversion
http://vwgolfmk1.org.uk/forum/index.php ... asic-price
http://www.qpeng.com/index2.php?option= ... df=1&id=42
http://vwgolfmk1.org.uk/forum/index.php ... asic-price
http://www.qpeng.com/index2.php?option= ... df=1&id=42
-
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:34 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: BEDFORD
- Contact:
Re: Engine change to vr6
The ABF is actually a bit tall for the engine bay, and a 9A is supposed to be the 16v of choice (not that people haven't shoe-horned ABFs in).unknownmale wrote:I've always liked the idea of this conversion, but the ABF is probably still the best route in my opinion.
Register Member 829
--
1980 (1976) Mk1 Junior Cup Replica
1987 MK2 GTX
--
1980 (1976) Mk1 Junior Cup Replica
1987 MK2 GTX
- unknownmale
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:34 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: London
Re: Engine change to vr6
Yeah, I believe it's the intake doesn't clear the bonnet, but read a few work arounds.the edmundator wrote:The ABF is actually a bit tall for the engine bay, and a 9A is supposed to be the 16v of choice (not that people haven't shoe-horned ABFs in).unknownmale wrote:I've always liked the idea of this conversion, but the ABF is probably still the best route in my opinion.
- David
Re: Engine change to vr6
Not that I'm contemplating this myself, but would a way around the weight issue be to move the battery to the rear? Or is the extra weight of the VR6 considerably more than that of the battery?
1985 GTL 1.8
Member number 928 (wish I had one)
Member number 928 (wish I had one)
- bengould
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:25 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: Renfrew.
Re: Engine change to vr6
According to this link the vr6 is only 75lbs heavier than a 16v, which is 35kg. Moving the battery would help but not all that much.mr.brown wrote:Off the shelf kits available if you have the money. Note point 7 here -
http://eurowise.com/shop/index.php?main ... ucts_id=11
Ben.
- unknownmale
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:34 pm
- fill in the right answer: 15
- Location: London
-
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: Cirencester / Swindon
Re: Engine change to vr6
i would actually question the weight saving of moving the battery to the rear, as you'd then have to add an enormous copper cable running front to rear, adding yet more weight. seeing as these cars only need a relatively small battery, you'll probably add as much weight to the front of the car in copper as you will save in moving the battery. only a thought
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:39 am
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: Nr Banbury, UK
Re: Engine change to vr6
A 16v is about 10kg heavier than an 8v of the same block type, so that makes it 45kg (about 50% of the 8v engine weight) heavier than the engine your car was born with. You also need to consider the position of that weight, which in general is a bit further forward than the 4 pot engines.bengould wrote:According to this link the vr6 is only 75lbs heavier than a 16v, which is 35kg. Moving the battery would help but not all that much.mr.brown wrote:Off the shelf kits available if you have the money. Note point 7 here -
http://eurowise.com/shop/index.php?main ... ucts_id=11
Ben.
It's your money, the VR6 makes a great noise, and they can make good power. However, I'd go 2.0 16v (and having done it, I can confirm that an ABF fits fine) rather than VR6 - more than enough power for road use, and plenty of tuning bits available.
Last edited by MikeH on Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1992 Scala ABF - SOLD
1989 Scala track toy. Dormant
1986 GTX - Lunar mileage but still a good un
Mk1 Classic Touring Car Project...slowly does it
1984 1.6 GT Project. 69k In progress
1.6GL. 2 Owners, 60k. SOLD
1.6 GL - 100k miles -Back on the road!
1989 Scala track toy. Dormant
1986 GTX - Lunar mileage but still a good un
Mk1 Classic Touring Car Project...slowly does it
1984 1.6 GT Project. 69k In progress
1.6GL. 2 Owners, 60k. SOLD
1.6 GL - 100k miles -Back on the road!
-
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:37 pm
- fill in the right answer: 10
- Location: Cirencester / Swindon
Re: Engine change to vr6
or go half way in bewteen, and fit a V5. i'd go for the 20v version though. my torpedo has a 10v version, and it is a bit lazy. having said that, the car weights over twice what the rocco does